TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Gordon Supply & Mfg. Co.

In re Gordon Supply & Mfg. Co., 129 F. 622 (M.D. Penn. 1904)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Federal District Courts
Decided
April 9, 1904
Docket
No. 411
Judges
Archbald
Citations
129 F. 6221904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 306
Syllabus
1. Bankruptcy — Trustees—Selection. Where a trustee chosen to administer the assets of a bankrupt corporation by a majority of the creditors was not only a stockholder in the corporation, but had been closely associated as attorney for those who had previously been in control, and whose management was not only the subject of criticism, but might call for action on the part of the trustee to hold them personally responsible, such trustee, though unobjectionable personally, should not be permitted to act over the objections of a minority. If 1. See Bankruptcy, vol. 6, Cent. Dig. § 185.
Summary
In Bankruptcy. On exceptions to action of referee approving of trustee selected by majority of the creditors.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Archbald

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

There can be no objection personally to the trustee who has been chosen by a majority of those interested in the estate, at the creditors’ meeting; and the right of such majority, under ordinary circumstances, to control the matter, must be conceded. The trustee is the representative of creditors, and they are the ones to decide who he shall be, subject only to the right of the court to supervise the choice where it is objected to. In the present instance the trustee chosen is not only a stockholder in the bankrupt corporation against which the proceedings were instituted, but he has been admittedly associated closely, as attorney and legal adviser, with those who have been hitherto in control; and their management is not only the subject of criticism, but may call for action on the part of the trustee to hold them personally responsible. To approve of the trustee now selected comes too near, therefore, to a continuation of previous conditions, to be warranted. With'so many others who would be fully as efficient and entirely acceptable, the majority have no right to impose their present choice on the objecting minority.

The election is therefore set aside, and a new election ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1906: 11914: 11933: 119062026peak 1906 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Eastlack145 F. 68 (D.N.J. 1906)
  2. In re Arti-Stain Co.216 F. 942 (D. Mass. 1914)
  3. In re Allied Owners' Corp.4 F. Supp. 957 (E.D.N.Y. 1933)

Most recent

  1. In re Allied Owners' Corp.4 F. Supp. 957 (E.D.N.Y. 1933)
  2. In re Arti-Stain Co.216 F. 942 (D. Mass. 1914)
  3. In re Eastlack145 F. 68 (D.N.J. 1906)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list