TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Thorp

In re Thorp, 130 F. 371 (E.D. Va. 1902)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, E.D. Virginia · Federal District Courts
Decided
July 18, 1902
Docket
No. 365
Judges
Waddill
Citations
130 F. 3711902 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4
Syllabus
1. Bankruptcy — Secured Claims — Validity op Security — Record—Rights op Trustee. Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 70a, 30 Stat. 565 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3451], provides that the trustee in bankruptcy shall be vested by operation of law with the title of the bankrupt to property which, prior to the filing of the petition, he could have by any means transferred, or which might have been levied on and sold by any judicial process against him. Section 67a, 30 Stat. 564 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3449], provides that claims which, for want of record, would not have been valid liens as against the claims of creditors of the bankrupt, shall not be liens against his estate; and section 67d declares that liens given or accepted in good faith, and not in contemplation of or in any fraud of the act, and for a present consideration, which have been recorded according to law, if record is necessary to impart notice, shall not be affected by the act. Held, that though, under section 70a, the title acquired by a bankrupt’s trustee was only that held by the bankrupt at the time of the filing of the petition, yet where a lien on certain of the bankrupt’s property was void as to any of his creditors under the state law by reason of a failure to record the same, such lien was void as to the trustee, under sections 67a, 67d, as to which he occupied the position of a bona fide purchaser for value.
Summary
In Bankruptcy. On objection of the trustee in bankruptcy to the allowance of any part of the claim of the John L. Roper Lumber Company as a secured claim.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Waddill

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

WADDILL, District Judge.

The ruling of the referee as set forth in the foregoing report is approved, and his opinion is adopted as that of the. court. Let decree be entered accordingly.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1905: 21913: 11918: 11931: 119052026peak 1905 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. English v. Ross140 F. 630 (M.D. Penn. 1905)
  2. In re Lukens138 F. 188 (E.D. Pa. 1905)
  3. Benner v. Scandinavian American Bank131 P. 1149 (Wash. 1913)
  4. Keyes v. Sabin172 P. 835 (Wash. 1918)
  5. In re Renfro-Wadenstein47 F.2d 238 (W.D. Wash. 1931)

Most recent

  1. In re Renfro-Wadenstein47 F.2d 238 (W.D. Wash. 1931)
  2. Keyes v. Sabin172 P. 835 (Wash. 1918)
  3. Benner v. Scandinavian American Bank131 P. 1149 (Wash. 1913)
  4. English v. Ross140 F. 630 (M.D. Penn. 1905)
  5. In re Lukens138 F. 188 (E.D. Pa. 1905)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list