TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Drumcraig

THE DRUMCRAIG THE LOCH TROOL

Drumcraig, 133 F. 804 (N.D. Cal. 1904)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, N.D. California · Federal District Courts
Decided
November 29, 1904
Docket
No. 13,261
Judges
Haven
Citations
133 F. 8041904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79
Headnotes
1. Collision — Defense of Inevitable Accident — Burden and Measure of Proof. To establish tbe defense of inevitable accident in a suit for collision, the respondent has the burden of proving that the collision resulted from a cause against which human shill and foresight could not have provided in the exercise of ordinary prudence. 2. Same — Vessel Breaking from Moorings. The breahing of a ship from' her moorings at a doch during a severe storm, and her drifting into collision with another moored vessel, held not due to inevitable accident, where there was such warning of the approach of the storm as required the master, in the exercise of ordinary care, to put out more fastening lines.
Summary
In Admiralty. Suit for collision.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Haven

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

This libel was filed by the owner of the ship Drumcraig, against the British ship Eoch Trool, to recover damages for injuries sustained as the result of a collision between the two vessels. The collision occurred about 4 o’clock on the morning of March 10, 1904. The Drumcraig was lying safely moored alongside the wharf at Oakland Pier, in the harbor of San Francisco. The Eoch Trool was moored at the same pier, and distant about a ship’s length from the Drumcraig. The Eoch Trool broke away from her moorings, and drifted into collision with the Drumcraig. It is claimed by the owners of the Eoch Trool that the collision was the result of inevitable accident.

The burden of proving that such was the cause of the collision is upon the Eoch Trool. The Louisiana, 3 Wall. 164 , 18 L. Ed. 85 ; The Andrew Welch (D. C.) 122 Fed. 557. An inevitable accident is something that human skill and foresight could not, in the exercise of ordinary prudence, have provided against. The Pennsylvania, 24 How. 307 , 16 L. Ed. 699 . Upon consideration of the evidence, my conclusion is that this defense of inevitable accident has not been sustained. I think it is shown by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the storm, although a violent one, gave sufficient warning of its approach to have made it the duty of the master of the Loch Trool to put out more fastening lines before the ship broke from her moorings, and the failure to *805 do this constitutes negligence for which the Loch Trool must respond in damages.

There will be a decree in favor of the libelant, and the case' is referred to United States Commissioner Manley to ascertain and report the amount of damages sustained by libelant.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1909: 11917: 11949: 11960: 119092026peak 1909 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mrs. Edith Boudoin v. J. Ray McDermott & Company, Inc.281 F.2d 81 (5th Cir. 1960)
  2. State Road Department of Florida v. United States85 F. Supp. 489 (N.D. Fla. 1949)
  3. The C. H. Northam181 F. 986 (D. Mass. 1909)
  4. The Campanello244 F. 312 (E.D.N.Y. 1917)

Most recent

  1. Mrs. Edith Boudoin v. J. Ray McDermott & Company, Inc.281 F.2d 81 (5th Cir. 1960)
  2. State Road Department of Florida v. United States85 F. Supp. 489 (N.D. Fla. 1949)
  3. The Campanello244 F. 312 (E.D.N.Y. 1917)
  4. The C. H. Northam181 F. 986 (D. Mass. 1909)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
The La., 70 U.S. (3 Wall.) 164 (1866) 171
Union S.S. Co. v. N.Y. & Va. S.S. Co., 65 U.S. (24 How.) 307 (1861) 42
Welch, 122 F. 557 (N.D. Cal. 1903) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list