TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Coleman

In re Coleman, 136 F. 818 (2d Cir. 1905)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 20, 1905
Docket
No. 26
Judges
Coxe, Townsend, Wallace
Citations
136 F. 81869 C.C.A. 4961905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4522
Headnotes
>1. Bankruptcy — Property of Bankrupt — Insurance Policies — Surrender Value. Where certain insurance policies belonging to a bankrupt hád no cash ■surrender value, but they had a collateral loan value and a paid-up insurance value, they had an inchoate value to which the bankrupt’s trustee was entitled as property, which, prior to the filing of the petition, the bankrupt could have transferred, etc. 2. Same — Bankrupt Act — Construction. Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 70, subd. 5, 30 Stat. 565 [U. S: Comp.' St. 1901, p. 3451], authorizing a bankrupt to retain insurance policies having a cash surrender value by paying the amount thereof to the trustee, does not by implication deprive the trustee of the right to policies having an inchoate, but no cash surrender, value. 3. Same. Where a bankrupt held a life insurance policy, payable to his wife, if living, otherwise to his executors, administrators, and assigns, and, though such policy had no cash surrender value, the insurer voluntarily agreed to pay a certain sum for the policy, on condition it received a release from the bankrupt and his wife,' the bankrupt’s interest, though contingent, was assignable, and his trustee was entitled to sell such interest and to have the bankrupt assign the same.
Summary
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed on opinion of Judge Thomas.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1905: 11907: 11908: 11909: 11910: 21912: 11916: 41934: 119052026peak 1916 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Van Kirk v. Vermont Slate140 F. 38 (N.D.N.Y. 1905)
  2. Burdett v. Burdett1910 OK 120, 109 P. 922
  3. In re White174 F. 333 (2d Cir. 1909)
  4. In re Herr182 F. 716 (M.D. Penn. 1910)
  5. Pollack v. Meyer Bros. Drug Co.233 F. 861 (8th Cir. 1916) · Concurrence
  6. Townsend's Assignee v. Townsend105 S.W. 937 (Ky. Ct. App. 1907) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. In re Greenspan8 F. Supp. 582 (S.D.N.Y. 1934)
  2. In re SAMUELS237 F. 796 (2d Cir. 1916)
  3. In re Farrand235 F. 809 (D. Me. 1916)
  4. Pollack v. Meyer Bros. Drug Co.233 F. 861 (8th Cir. 1916) · Concurrence
  5. In re Cohen230 F. 733 (S.D. Ga. 1916)
  6. In re Churchill198 F. 711 (E.D. Wis. 1912)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list