TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Edward Hess & Co.

In re Edward Hess & Co., 136 F. 988 (E.D. Pa. 1905)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Federal District Courts
Decided
April 14, 1905
Docket
No. 1,993
Judges
Holland
Citations
136 F. 9881905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 283
Headnotes
Bankruptcy — Claim op Privilege — Production op Books op Account. Tlie finding of a referee that there was no foundation in fact for the claim of privilege set up by a bankrupt on the ground that his books and papers, if produced, would tend to incriminate him, affirmed, and an order made requiring him to produce his books and to answer certain questions propounded to himthe only witnesses called, aside from the bankrupt, having testified that an examination of the books disclosed nothing of an incriminating character, and that they were properly kept.
Summary
In Bankruptcy. On certificate from referee.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Holland

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

HOLLAND, District Judge.

Some time ago a reference was made in this case “to take such testimony as the bankrupt might offer to show his answer that his books and papers contain evidence which may tend to incriminate him is made in good faith, to protect him against a criminal prosecution that has been instituted or which may be brought against him, and report such evidence and his conclusions thereon to this court, specifying which of the said ■documents, if any, did or did not contain such alleged incriminating evidence.” (D. C.) 134 Fed. 109 . The bankrupt and two witnesses appeared before the referee. Certain questions were propounded to the witnesses, who were unable to answer without the books and papers belonging to the bankrupt from which the data could be obtained to enable them to correctly answer the questions. The bankrupt refused to produce his books or papers referred to by these witnesses, and refused to answer certain questions. The referee ■directed him to produce the books and papers and to answer the ■questions. Whereupon counsel for the bankrupt requested the referee to certify the question to this court as to whether the bankrupt should be compelled to answer the questions and to juoduce the books and papers.

The two witnesses called testified that an examination of the * books shows nothing in them tending to incriminate the bankrupt and that the book's were properly and correctly kept. The referee, in an opinion filed, concludes that there is nothing in the answer to *989 the question referred to which will tend to incriminate him, nor is there anything in the books and papers which will have that effect, and therefore he should be compelled to prdduce his books and papers and to answer the questions.. In these conclusions we think the referee is right, for the reasons stated in his opinion.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the bankrupt produce the books and papers referred to in the opinion of the referee, in accordance with his order, and do answer the questions-stated in his report.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 11938: 11963: 119272026peak 1927 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States ex rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner of Immigration273 U.S. 103 (1927)
  2. In re Mutual Security Savings & Loan Ass'n, Inc.214 F. Supp. 877 (D. Maryland 1963)
  3. United States v. Mary Helen Coal Corp.24 F. Supp. 50 (E.D. Ky. 1938)

Most recent

  1. In re Mutual Security Savings & Loan Ass'n, Inc.214 F. Supp. 877 (D. Maryland 1963)
  2. United States v. Mary Helen Coal Corp.24 F. Supp. 50 (E.D. Ky. 1938)
  3. United States ex rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner of Immigration273 U.S. 103 (1927)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
In re Hess, 134 F. 109 (E.D. Pa. 1905) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list