TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Elson v. Town of Waterford

Elson v. Town of Waterford, 140 F. 800 (1905)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · Historical Federal Courts
Decided
November 2, 1905
Docket
No. 559
Judges
Platt
Citations
140 F. 8001905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4846
Syllabus
Abatement and Revival — Rights of Action which Survive — ‘Action for Personal Injury. Gen. St. Conn. 1902, § 2020, giving any person injured in person or property by means of a defective road or bridge a right of action for damages against tbe municipality whose duty it is to maintain such road or bridge in repair, is not a penal statute in such sense that a right of action thereon does not survive the death of the person injured.
Summary
At Law. On motion by defendant for judgment notwithstanding verdict. • This is an action by plaintiff, as administrator of Jacob Elson, based on Gen. St. Conn. 1902, § 2020, to recover damages for an injury received by his intestate by being dragged from a load of stone, on which he was riding on a highway, by the overhanging branches of a tree, which injury resulted in his death a few days later. There was a trial, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff for $2,500. The present motion is based on the case of Bartram v. Sharon, 71 Conn. 686, 43 Atl. 143, 46 L. R. A. 144, 71 Am. St. Rep. 225, which held that the damages recoverable under such statute are in the nature of a penalty.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Platt

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PLATT, District Judge.

I do not think that the opinion of the Supreme Court of the state in Bartram v. Sharon, 71 Conn. 686 , 43 Atl. 143 , 46 L. R. A. 144, 71 Am. St. Rep. 225 , can be tortured into an authority for so construing section 2020, Gen. St. Conn. 1902, that it becomes such a penal statute as will prevent the survival of an action upon it, in case of death resulting from a defective highway. Last amendment to motion in arrest denied.

All former motions filed by defendant since the verdict having been heretofore denied, let judgment be entered on the verdict.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Bartram v. Town of Sharon, 46 L.R.A. 144 (Conn. 1899) 99

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list