Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Harold
Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Harold, 142 F. 1037 (6th Cir. 1906)
Summary
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Arrel, McVey, Rowland & Harrington and Allen, Water & Andress, for plaintiff in error.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of the Circuit Court affirmed, with costs, on the authority of the former opinion of this court. 133 Fed. 384 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.