TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Kuffler

In re Kuffler, 144 F. 445 (E.D.N.Y. 1906)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, E.D. New York · Federal District Courts
Decided
February 16, 1906
Judges
Thomas
Citations
144 F. 4451906 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 258
Headnotes
Bankruptcy — Discharge—Refusal of Discharge, in Prior Proceedings. The dismissal of the petition of a bankrupt for discharge for want of prosecution, and the overruling of a motion to reinstate the same constitute an adjudication that he is not' entitled to a discharge which precludes his discharge in a second bankruptcy proceeding from debts that were provable in the first proceeding.
Summary
In Bankruptcy. On application for discharge.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Thomas

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

THOMAS, District Judge.

In earlier bankruptcy proceedings in the Southern district of New York, the bankrupt’s petition for discharge, which was opposed by a creditor filing specifications, was dismissed for lack of prosecution, and the Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed a petition for review upon the ground that the order of the District Court was a final judgment from which an appeal should be taken. Later the District Court denied a motion for leave to proceed with the specifications. It is thought that the bankrupt after his specifications were dismissed was in the same state as if he had not filed them in time, and that by his default he was barred from a discharge. Hence, as a matter has been adjudicated adversely to the bankrupt, he cannot in this proceeding be discharged from the debts provable in the former proceeding.

An order confirming these views will be entered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list