TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

J. A. Scriven Co. v. Girard Co.

J. A. Scriven Co. v. Girard Co., 148 F. 1019 (2d Cir. 1906)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 19, 1906
Docket
No. 23
Judges
Coxe, Ctjriam, Townsend, Wallace
Citations
148 F. 101979 C.C.A. 5331906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4401
Summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District, of New York. On appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York, dated October 2. 1903, granting an injunction pendente lite.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Ctjriam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CTJRIAM.

Upon full consideration of the facts appearing in the record we are of the opinion that the order of the Circuit Court should bo' amended so as to read as follows: “Ordered, that until the further order of this court the said defendant Girard Company, its officers, directors, trustees, managers, servants, agents, attorneys and workmen, and each and every of them, be, and they hereby are, restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly making use of the words “Elastic Seam” or “Stretehiseam” in the construction, manufacture, sale, delivery, working, operation or use, offering for sale, or advertising men’s drawers with a longitudinal yellow strip down the sides, or down the sides and back, of said drawers. And it is further ordered, that the said defendant Girard Company, its officers, directors, trustees,'managers, servants, agents, attorneys, and workmen, and each and every of them, be, and they are hereby, restrained and enjoined from using said words “Elastic Seam” or “Stretehiseam” in connection with men’s drawers containing strips of elastic material, white, gray, or other color, unless accompanied by a statement conspicuously, clearly, and unmistakably specifying that such drawers are the product of the Girard Company, and are not the product of Die Scriven Company.” The order, as so modified, is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1907: 119072026peak 1907 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. J. A. Scriven Co. v. Morris154 F. 914 (1907)

Most recent

  1. J. A. Scriven Co. v. Morris154 F. 914 (1907)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list