TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Aultman Co.

United States v. Aultman Co., 148 F. 1022 (6th Cir. 1906)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 31, 1906
Citations
148 F. 10221906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4407
Summary
No. 1,563. In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Action for penalty for violation of alien contract law. Judgment below for defendant affirmed, on opinion of Tayler, District Judge. See 143 Fed. 922 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1912: 119122026peak 1912 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Frick v. Lewis195 F. 693 (6th Cir. 1912)

Most recent

  1. Frick v. Lewis195 F. 693 (6th Cir. 1912)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Aultman Co., 143 F. 922 (N.D. Ohio 1906) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list