United States v. Deguirro
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
DE HAVEN, District Judge.
The general reasoning found in the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit in the case of Dastervignes v. United States, 122 Fed. 30 , 58 C. C. A. 346 , has created in my mind such doubt of the correctness of my prior decision in the case of United States v. Peter Camou, filed June 24, 1902 (not reported), that I deem it proper at this time to overrule the motion to defendants for an arrest of judgment; and if dissatisfied with this ruling, the defendants have the right to bring the question involved before the Circuit Court of Appeals for decision.
The motion in arrest of judgment will be denied, and each of the defendants fined in the sum of $20.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.