Bradford v. United States
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
In this case Bradford and Wright were tried together in the Circuit Court and found guilty on certain counts of the indictment. They reserved a bill of exceptions, and sued out a writ of error to this court. The trial judge, Hon. Charles Parlange, annexed to the bill of exceptions an elaborate statement of the case, and of his reasons for his several rulings complained of and to which exceptions were reserved. Those reasons are given in United States v. Bradford et al. (C. C.) 148 Fed. 413, 430 . The opinion there reported deals with and decides all the material questions argued at the bar and in the briefs submitted in this court. After careful consideration of the argument and the briefs, we have reached the same conclusions announced by the learned trial judge. We are of opinion, therefore, that there is no reversible error in the record.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
On Rehearing
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
■On Rehearing.
In this cas.e the plaintiffs in error present applications for rehearing. They do not;show any ground therefor that induces us to believe that *617 a rehearing might result in our changing the views announced in the decision of the case heretofore rendered.
eThe application for rehearing is therefore denied
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.