TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kentucky State Board of Control for Charitable Institutions v. Lewis

Ky. State Bd. of Control for Charitable Institutions v. Lewis, 176 F. 556 (6th Cir. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 21, 1910
Docket
No. 1,995
Judges
Knappen, Severens, Warrington
Citations
176 F. 556100 C.C.A. 2081910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4282
Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Headnotes
Courts (§ 405*) — Federal 'Courts — Jurisdiction op Circuit Court op Appeals. The Circuit Court of Appeals is without jurisdiction of an appeal in an ancillary suit where the only question presented by the assignments of error is the jurisdiction of the court below' in the principal suit, jurisdiction in such case being exclusively vested in the Supreme Court by Act March 3, 1891, c. 517, § 5, 26 Stat. 827 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 549), creating the Circuit Courts of Appeals. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. § 1099; Dec. Dig. § 405,* Jurisdiction of Circuit Court of Appeals in general, see notes to Lau Cw Bew v. United States, 1 C. C. A. 6; United States Freehold Land & Em. Co. v. Gallegos, 32'C. C. A. 475.]
Summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky. In Equity. Suit by Edward C. Lewis and John H. Kitchen, partners as Lewis & Kitchen, against the Kentucky State Board of Control for Charitable Institutions and others. Defendants appeal from a decree granting an injunction.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

In this cause the assignments of error are directed solely to the question of the jurisdiction of the court below in the case whereunto the bill in this case is ancillary. This bill depends for the jurisdiction, not upon the conditions of jurisdiction requisite to an independent suit, but upon the jurisdiction of the case which it is filed to promote. No question of merits of the controversy is presented.

In these circumstances, the jurisdiction of an appeal is exclusively vested in the Supreme Court by section 5 of the act creating the Court of Appeals (Act March 3, 1891, c. 517, 26 Stat. 827 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 549]). Pope v. Louisville, N. A. & C. R. Co., 173 U. S. 573 , 19 Sup. Ct. 500, 43 L. Ed. 814 , and cases cited in that case. United States v. Severens, 71 Fed. 768 , 18 C. C. A. 314 ; Coler v. Grainger County, 74 Fed. 21 , 20 C. C. A. 267 . And the appeal to this court must be dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1912: 219122026peak 1912 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co.195 F. 12 (6th Cir. 1912)
  2. Olds v. Herman H. Hettler Lumber Co.195 F. 9 (6th Cir. 1912)

Most recent

  1. A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co.195 F. 12 (6th Cir. 1912)
  2. Olds v. Herman H. Hettler Lumber Co.195 F. 9 (6th Cir. 1912)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Pope v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Ry. Co., 173 U.S. 573 (1899) 63
Coler v. Grainger Cnty., 74 F. 16 (6th Cir. 1896) 10
United States ex rel. Cnty. of Iron v. Severens, 71 F. 768 (6th Cir. 1896) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list