TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

O'Sullivan v. Felix

O'Sullivan v. Felix, 194 F. 88 (5th Cir. 1912)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 30, 1912
Docket
No. 2,255
Judges
Maxey, McCormick, Spielby
Citations
194 F. 88114 C.C.A. 1661912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1140
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Action (§ 19*) — Courts (§ 875*) — Statute Applicable — Nature oe Action. An action under Rev. St. § 1980' (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1262), for an assault committed in attempting to prevent plaintiff from voting, in violation of the civil rights act, is one foi’ damages, and not for a penalty, and is governed as to limitation by' the statutes of the state where brought. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Action, Cent. Dig. §§ 105, 100; Dec. Dig. § 19;* Courts, Cent. Dig. § 983; Dec. Dig. § 375.*]
Summary
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Action at law by E. A. O’Sullivan against Paul Eelix and others. Judgment for defendants and plaintiff brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that this is an action for damages, and not for a penalty. The statute of limitation of five years against suits for penalties or forfeitures (R. S. § 1047 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 727]) is therefore not applicable. We find no federal statute of limitations applicable to the case. It follows that the state *89 statute, which prescribes the action in one year, must be applied. Civil Code of Louisiana, arts. 3536, 3537. We are constrained, therefore, to hold that the trial court correctly ruled that the action is barred.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1938: 11940: 119382026peak 1938 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mitchell v. Greenough100 F.2d 184 (9th Cir. 1938)
  2. Moffett v. Commerce Trust Co.87 F. Supp. 438 (W.D. Mo. 1940)

Most recent

  1. Moffett v. Commerce Trust Co.87 F. Supp. 438 (W.D. Mo. 1940)
  2. Mitchell v. Greenough100 F.2d 184 (9th Cir. 1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list