Miller v. Carlton
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
The theory upon which this cause was heard by the referee, and the order by him passed and confirmed by the judge, in which the "petitioner was ordered, upon pain of imprisonment for contempt, to surrender a stock of goods, or, in the alternative, to pay the value of the same, within 20 days from the date of the order, were in direct conflict with the views of this court as expressed in Samel v. Dodd, 142 Fed. 68 , 73 C. C. A. 254 ; and therefore, upon the authority of that case, the order should be, and it is hereby, reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.