L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
It is equitable that the penholders which the defendant has in good faith marked in accordance with Judge Hand’s-decree with the .suffix “not connected with the original Waterman 'pen,” or in accordance with the opinion of. this court before the use of the name “Arthur” was required, should • be permitted to be; sold and the order for the mandate may so provide.
The application for further changes in the order is denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.