TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Droysen v. Hansen

Robert L. DROYSEN v. Ronald HANSEN

Droysen v. Hansen, 59 F.R.D. 483 (E.D. Wis. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Federal District Courts
Decided
August 16, 1973
Docket
No. 72-C-544
Judges
Reynolds
Citations
59 F.R.D. 4831973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12272

Opinion of the Court — Reynolds

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

DECISION AND ORDER REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff contends he v/as illegally arrested for pandering in July 1972. He brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 for monetary relief. Defendants move to dismiss this action.

An action for an illegal arrest, i. e., an arrest without probable cause to believe the accused has violated a criminal statute, may be brought under 42 U. S.C. § 1983. Carter v. Carlson, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 388 , 447 F.2d 358 (1971); MacDonald v. Musick, 425 F.2d 373 (9th Cir.1970); Kerr v. Chicago, 424 F.2d 1134 (7th Cir.1970); Joseph v. Rowlen, 402 F.2d 367 (7th Cir.1968); Marland v. Heyse, 315 F.2d 312 (10th Cir.1963). Ever since the Supreme Court decision of Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 , 81 S. Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961), a wide variety of tort actions, once the exclusive concern of the state judiciary, are properly presented to the federal courts under § 1983. In his concurring opinion in Monroe , Justice Frankfurter suggested the effect of that decision by summa *484 rizing the attitude that had existed in the past:

“ * * Most courts have refused to convert what would otherwise be ordinary state-law claims for false imprisonment or malicious prosecution or assault and battery into civil rights cases on the basis of conclusory allegations of constitutional violation. * * *” Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. at 240 n. 68, 81 S.Ct. at 512 .

Plaintiff does not state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 , however. Conclusory allegations of conspiracy, without any specification of the agreement forming the conspiracy, are insufficient. Powell v. Workmen’s Compensation Board of State of New York, 327 F.2d 131 (2d Cir.1964); Thompson v. Heither, 235 F.2d 176 (6th Cir.1956); Post v. Payton, 323 F.Supp. 799 (E.D.N.Y.1971); Weise v. Reisner, 318 F. Supp. 580 (E.D.Wis.1970). Moreover, the plaintiff’s claim rests on considerations of due process, not equal protection. He has not alleged the invidious discrimination which § 1985 was designed to prohibit. If, in fact, the de-' fendants conspired to cause an illegal arrest and the arrest that resulted was illegal, § 1983 is capable of providing plaintiff full relief, and recourse to § 1985 is not necessary.

On a motion to dismiss, the allegations of fact in plaintiff’s complaint are taken as true, and all inferences from those facts are drawn in plaintiff’s favor. Defendants’ affidavits which dispute the factual allegations have no bearing on such a motion.

It is therefore ordered that defendants’ motion to dismiss the claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 be and it hereby is granted.

It is further ordered that defendants’ motion to dismiss the claim under 42 U. S.C. § 1983 be and it hereby is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1974: 11975: 41976: 21978: 21982: 12026: 119742026peak 1975 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Frank Pritchard v. James E. Perry and H. H. Griffis508 F.2d 423 (4th Cir. 1975)
  2. Everett v. City of Chester391 F. Supp. 26 (E.D. Pa. 1975)
  3. Wetherington v. Phillips380 F. Supp. 426 (E.D.N.C. 1974)
  4. Diamond v. Marland395 F. Supp. 432 (S.D. Ga. 1975)
  5. State of Louisiana ex rel. Purkey v. Ciolino393 F. Supp. 102 (E.D. La. 1975)
  6. Smith v. Sinclair424 F. Supp. 1108 (W.D. Okla. 1976)

Most recent

  1. Terrance Lamar Taylor v. City of PeoriaNo. 1:26-cv-01051 (C.D. Ill. June 8, 2026)
  2. Barr v. Hardiman583 F. Supp. 1 (N.D. Ill. 1982)
  3. Raitport v. General Motors Corp.450 F. Supp. 1349 (E.D. Pa. 1978)
  4. Coggins v. McQueen447 F. Supp. 960 (E.D. Pa. 1978)
  5. Smith v. Sinclair424 F. Supp. 1108 (W.D. Okla. 1976)
  6. Bur v. Gilbert415 F. Supp. 335 (E.D. Wis. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 9

DepthCaseCited by
Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961) 3,951
Carter v. Carlson, 447 F.2d 358 (D.C. Cir. 1971) 178
Powell v. Workmen's Comp. Bd. of the State of N.Y., 327 F.2d 131 (2d Cir. 1964) 78
Joseph v. Rowlen, 402 F.2d 367 (7th Cir. 1968) 66
Post v. Payton, 323 F. Supp. 799 (E.D.N.Y. 1971) 50
MacDonald v. Musick, 425 F.2d 373 (9th Cir. 1970) 44
Marland v. Heyse, 315 F.2d 312 (10th Cir. 1963) 27
Weise v. Reisner, 318 F. Supp. 580 (E.D. Wis. 1970) 23
Thompson v. Heither, 235 F.2d 176 (6th Cir. 1956) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list