In re K. Marks & Co.

In re K. Marks & Co., 218 F. 453 (2d Cir. 1914)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: November 10, 1914
Docket: No. 7
Judges: Coxe, Lacombe, Rogers
Citations: 218 F. 453134 C.C.A. 2531914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1561

Headnotes

1. Sales (§ 44*) — Fraud—Remedy of Selleb — Recovery of Pbofekty. When a buyer, being insolvent, induces a seller to sell him goods on credit, which he does not intend to pay for, the seller may rescind and recover the property. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Sales, Cent. Dig. § 93; Dec. Dig. § 44.*} 2. Bankruptcy (§ 140*) — Sale to Bankrupt — Fraud—Disaffirmance—Re-covery of Goods. A seller of goods to bankrupts while insolvent, in order to disaffirm and recover the goods, must show that the bankrupts were insolvent at the time of purchase, that they concealed the fact, and intended then not to pay for the goods. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bankruptcy, Cent. Dig. §§ 198, 199, 219, 225; Dec. Dig. § 140.*] 3. Sales (§ 52*) — Fraud of Buyer — Recovery of Goods — Evidence. Where the bankrupts, a year prior to failure, had had good credit, and were reported in Dun’s as “first class” on the strength of statements previously made and not corrected, and on applying to petitioner to purchase a quantity of flour, knowing themselves to be hopelessly insolvent, replied to a question as to their financial ability by saying, “Look us up in the commercial agencies, and you will find that we have good credit and are amply responsible for all our obligations,” and petitioner, relying on the truth of such statement, sold the goods on credit, such facts were sufficient to show a fraudulent sale, entitling petitioner to recover the goods from the bankrupts’ trustee. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Sales, Cent. Dig. §§ 118-144,1045; Dee. Dig. § 52.*]

Summary

Petition to Revise and Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. On appeal from a final order and decree of the District Court for the Southern District of New York entered May 15, 1913, confirming the report of the special master in reclamation proceedings instituted by the Hecker-Jones-Jewell Milling Company to reclaim property alleged to be owned by the said petitioner which was in the possession of the receiver of the bankrupts. The property consisted of 725 sacks of flour. The receiver, having been appointed trustee, appeals to this court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Coxe

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

COXE, Circuit Judge.

[1] The law is well settled that when a party, being insolvent, induces another to sell him goods on credit which he does not intend to pay for, the court may order the contract disaffirm-ed and restore the property.

[2] The special master points out the three propositions which the claimant must establish before he can rescind the contract and recover the goods: First. The insolvency of the bankrupts at the time the purchase was made. Second. The concealment from the claimant of the fact of insolvency. Third. Intention on the part of the bankrupts, at ■the time of the sale, not to pay for the goods.

[3] As to the first proposition there can be no dispute. The bankrupts were hopelessly insolvent and they knew it. The second proposition is established with almost equal certainty. The bankrupts did not, in so many words, say that they were solvent and intended to pay for the flour. Their conduct was such, however, as to induce the milling company to believe that it could rely implicitly upon the high financial standing and good faith of the bankrupts.

*455 In reply to questions as to their ability to pay, a member of the firm, over the telephone, said, “Well, look us up,” knowing that Dun’s Agency had reported them “first class” on the strength of statements made a year previous which they had not corrected, although they had made large losses in the meantime. It was tantamount to saying, “Rook us up in the commercial agencies and you will find that we have good credit and are amply responsible for all our obligations.” This is what the bankrupts did say in substance and it was the reliance upon the truth of this statement that induced petitioner to sell its goods.

The special master had the advantage of seeing and healing the witnesses and his finding upon the facts should not be disturbed. The evidence brings the case within the doctrine of the following authorities: Donaldson, Assignee, v. Farwell, 93 U. S. 631 , 23 L. Ed. 993 ; In re Sol Aarons & Co., 193 Fed. 646 , 113 C. C. A. 514 .

The order is affirmed with costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

In re New York Commercial Co.228 F. 120 (2d Cir. 1915)
In re Myley Electrical Supply Co.291 F. 775 (E.D.N.Y. 1923)
The Henry W. Breyer17 F.2d 423 (D. Maryland 1927)
In re Weissman19 F.2d 769 (2d Cir. 1927)
California Conserving Co. v. D'AVANZO62 F.2d 528 (2d Cir. 1933)
Atlantic Steamer Supply Company v. the SS Tradewind153 F. Supp. 354 (D. Maryland 1957)

Most recent

Atlantic Steamer Supply Company v. the SS Tradewind153 F. Supp. 354 (D. Maryland 1957)
In re Stridacchio107 F. Supp. 486 (D.N.J. 1952)
Monier v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York82 F.2d 252 (2d Cir. 1936)
California Conserving Co. v. D'AVANZO62 F.2d 528 (2d Cir. 1933)
Continuous Zinc Furnace Co. v. American Smelting & Refining Co.61 F.2d 958 (2d Cir. 1932)
In re Baltimore Shoe House20 F.2d 134 (D. Maryland 1927)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Donaldson v. Farwell, 93 U.S. 631 (1877)	63
	In re Sol. Aarons & Co., 193 F. 646 (2d Cir. 1912)	10

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list