TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Savio v. Vieno

James Savio v. Anton Vieno

Savio v. Vieno, 193 Ill. App. 395 (1915)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Court of Illinois · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 11, 1915
Docket
No. Gen. No. 5,988
Judges
Dibell
Citations
193 Ill. App. 395
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Abstract of the Decision. 1. Injunction, § 367*—when denial of motion to dissolve is appealable. Under section 123 of the Practice Act (J. & A. j[ 8661), an appeal lies from the denial of a motion to dissolve an injunction made either before or after answer. 2. Injunction, § 183*—when verification sufficient. The verification of an injunction bill, as well as a supplemental bill and amendments thereto, held absolute, except as to matters expressly charged on information and belief. 3. Injunction, § 165*—when preliminary injunction dissolved by amendment to bill. The filing of an amendment to an injunction bill, as well as a supplemental bill and amendments thereto, which merely make the allegations of the original bill more specific, although made without an express order that they should be without prejudice to a preliminary injunction previously granted, do not have the effect of dissolving such writ. 4. Fraternal and mutual benefit societies, § 55*—when member may enjoin disposition of property. A bill of complaint filed by a member of a local beneficiary society against the society and its officers, alleging an illegal attempt by the defendants and others to secede from the order, and that the defendants were in possession of money and property belonging to the society which they intended to turn over to a new society which they intended to join, or to convert it to their own use, held to justify the granting of a preliminary injunction until a hearing on the merits.
Summary
Appeal from the City Court of Spring Valley; the Hon. C. E. Sheldon, Judge, presiding.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Dibell

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Mr. Justice Dibell delivered the opinion of the court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1916: 11917: 119162026peak 1916 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Savio v. Vieno203 Ill. App. 631 (1916)
  2. Court Rose No. 12, Foresters of America v. Corna117 N.E. 144 (Ill. 1917)

Most recent

  1. Court Rose No. 12, Foresters of America v. Corna117 N.E. 144 (Ill. 1917)
  2. Savio v. Vieno203 Ill. App. 631 (1916)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list