Good Products Co. v. Dwyer
Good Products Company, in Error v. James J. Dwyer, in Error
Good Prods. Co. v. Dwyer, 203 Ill. App. 217 (1917)
Headnotes
Abstract of the Decision.
1. Accord and satisfaction, § 1*—what is subject of. A claim for an unliquidated amount is a proper subject of accord and satisfaction.
2. Accord and satisfaction, § 6*—when third person is bound by settlement. A settlement of a disputed claim for labor performed in the construction of a building by a subcontractor between such subcontractor and the owner constitutes an' accord and satisfaction as to the contractor.
Summary
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Mr. Justice Holdom delivered the opinion of the court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.