Wells v. McGregor
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
The CHIEF JUSTICE:
We have often held that such orders as that which the Supreme Court of the Territory of Montana affirmed, are within the discretion of the inferior coui’t. They are not final judgments, within the meaning of the Judiciary Act of 1789.
† Of course they are not within the meaning of the 9th section of the organic act of the Territory.
‡ It appears also that the writ of error bears the teste of the clerk of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Montana, and not the teste of the Chief Justice of this court. But the statute *190 makes teste of the Chief Justice indispensable, * and we have no power to change its requirements.
On both grounds, therefore, the writ of error must be Dismissed.
† Cook v. Burnley, 11 Wallace, 676 Phillips’s Practice, 66.
‡ 13 Stat. at Large, 89.
* 1 Stat. at Large, 93.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.