In re Schiff
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
WINSLOW, District Judge.
This is a motion to direct the receiver in bankruptcy to pay one month’s rent for his occupation of certain premises for the month of April, 1923. » The landlord has one month’s security on deposit under, the terms of the lease.
The affidavits of both of the- parties state some conclusions and some facts. The lease provides for its termination upon the institution of bankruptcy proceedings, at the option, however, of the lessor. From the facts stated in the affidavits, it would appear that the landlord has repossessed himself of the premises. The deposit is not liquidated damages, and, under the terms of the lease, is applicable to rent. In the absence of1 any counterclaim, it belongs to the receiver, less the amount due for occupancy by the receiver. This equals the amount of the deposit, and the lessor is entitled to apply the deposit on account of the use and occupation by the receiver. In re Tanory (D. C.) 270 Fed. 872 , 46 Am. Bankr. Rep. 520.
The motion is denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.