TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

The Express

The Express, 61 F. 513 (2d Cir. 1893)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 20, 1893
Docket
No. 50
Judges
Lagombe, Shipman, Wallace
Citations
61 F. 5139 C.C.A. 5981893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2379
Summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. In Admiralty. For decision of the district court, see 48 Fed. 323.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the opinion of the court below in this cause, and affirm the decree, with interest and costs in this court to the appellee.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1920: 11936: 119202026peak 1920 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. The City of Norfolk266 F. 641 (4th Cir. 1920)
  2. United Mail S. S. Co. v. Farley17 F. Supp. 311 (E.D.N.Y. 1936)

Most recent

  1. United Mail S. S. Co. v. Farley17 F. Supp. 311 (E.D.N.Y. 1936)
  2. The City of Norfolk266 F. 641 (4th Cir. 1920)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list