Fourth Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. City of Belleville

PER CURTAM.

This was a suit at law, which, upon written stipulation of the parties, was tried by the court, without the intervention of a jury. The court found generally in favor of the defendant, the city of Belleville, and judgment was thereupon rendered in its favor. There was no special finding of facts and no statement of conclusions of law. Error is assigned only upon the general finding of the court. There is, therefore, nothing for this court to review. Martinton v Fairbanks, 112 U. S. 670 , 5 Sup. Ct. 321; Boardman v. Toffey, 117 U. S. 271 , 6 Sup. Ct. 734; Jenks’ Adm’r v. Stapp, 9 U. S. App. 34, 3 C. C. A. 244 , and 52 Fed. 641 ; Skinner v. Franklin Co., 9 U. S. App. 676, 6 C. C. A. 118 , and 56 Fed. 783 ; Distilling & Cattle Feeding Co. v. Gottschalk Co., 21 U. S. App. 638, 13 C. C. A. 618 , and 66 Fed. 609 ; Phipps v. Harding, 34 U. S. App. 148, 17 C. C. A. 203 , and 70 Fed. 468 ; Woodbury v. City of Shawneetown. 31 U. S. App. 655, 20 C. C. A. 400 , and 71 Fed. 205 ; Seymour v. White Co., 31 U. S. App. 658, 20 C. C. A. 102 , and 71 Fed. 207 . The writ of error is dismissed.