TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Regina Music-Box Co. v. Guendet

Regina Music-Box Co. v. Guendet, 87 F. 333 (1898)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Historical Federal Courts
Decided
May 13, 1898
Docket
No. 7
Judges
Shipman
Citations
87 F. 3331898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2586
Headnotes
Patents — Imphovements in Music Boxes. The Bra ehhaus on & Riessner patent, No. 500,372, for an improved fly fan or governor for music boxes, held valid and infringed.
Summary
This was a suit in equity by the Regina Music-Box Company against Emile L. Guendet for alleged infringement of a patent for an invention.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Shipman

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

SHIPMAN, Circuit Judge.

The bill in equity in this case was based upon the infringement by the defendant of the three claims of letters patent No. 500,372, dated June 27, 1893, and issued to Gustav A. Brachhausen and Paul Riessner, for an improved fly fan or governor for music boxes. The patent is, and was at the commencement of the suit, owned by the complainant. The defendant appeared in the case, and filed an answer, to which the complainant filed a replication. Prima facie, answering, and rebuttal proofs were taken by the respective parties, in the taking of which the defendant participated. In the answering proofs, the defendant calk'd no witness, but introduced eight prior letters patent. Upon the hearing before this court, the complainant appeared, and was heard by Ms counsel, Antonio Knauth, Esq.; and the defendant did not appear. The validity of the patent has been sustained in this district by Judge Townsend, in Music-Box Co. v. Paillard, 85 Fed. 644 . Infringement in this case is proved. I perceive no reason why the usual interlocutory decree for an injunction against the infringement of the three claims of the patent, and for an accounting, should not be entered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Regina Music Box Co. v. Paillard, 85 F. 644 (1898) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list