TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Dixon

United States v. Jack M. DIXON, John Thur Bylund, and Howard C. Arnold

United States v. Dixon, 506 F.2d 899 (5th Cir. 1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 15, 1975
Docket
No. 73-3910
Judges
Gee, Roney, Tuttle
Citations
506 F.2d 8991975 U.S. App. LEXIS 16570

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM:

The single issue on this appeal is the constitutionality of the 8 U.S.C.A. § 1357 search of a vehicle conducted by border agents at the permanent border checkpoint at Sierra Blanca, Texas. On the basis of our decision today in United States v. Hart, 506 F.2d 887 (5th Cir. 1975), we hold this search to be constitutional. We affirm the convictions of Jack M. Dixon, John Bylund and Howard C. Arnold for possession with intent to distribute approximately 60 pounds of marijuana, a Schedule I Controlled Substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841 (a)(1).

On September 4, 1973, at approximately 4:30 a.m., Dixon, Bylund and Arnold approached the permanent border checkpoint which is located four miles west of Sierra Blanca, Texas, on Interstate Highway 10. Border Patrol Agent Walter Mann, Jr. saw the vehicle in which they were riding stop short of the checkpoint. As Agent Mann approached the vehicle, a pickup truck with an attached camper proceeded toward the checkpoint area. Mann radioed his partner to stop the pickup.

Having checked .the area in which the truck stopped for physical evidence and having found none, Mann asked Dixon, Bylund and Arnold for their names and took the license plate number of their vehicle. A telephone call for a record check produced a “kickback” on one of the men in the truck. The record does not reveal the nature of the information thus obtained.

Mann looked through the window of the camper with his flashlight and noticed what appeared to be marijuana seed. At this point, one of the three men asked Mann if he would let them go if they gave him the marijuana that they had for their personal use. A search of the vehicle produced approximately 60 pounds of marijuana.

*900 In United States v. Hart, supra, we held that the decision of the Supreme Court in Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 , 93 S.Ct. 2535 , 37 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973), did not alter the precedential effect of prior opinions of this Circuit upholding the validity of searches conducted pursuant to 8 U.S.C.A. § 1357 at the Sierra Blanca checkpoint. In Hart , border patrol agents at the Sierra Blanca checkpoint stopped defendant’s vehicle, requested that defendant give his citizenship, and, as a routine matter, asked defendant to open his trunk so that the agents could search for aliens illegally in the United States. When the trunk was opened, the agents detected an oder of marijuana and discovered a quantity of the substance. We upheld the search in Hart as constitutional on the authority of United States v. McGlynn, 496 F.2d 1316 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. Hufstetler, 496 F.2d 1184 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. Merla, 493 F.2d 910 (5th Cir. 1974), and other decisions of this Court.

Since the facts of this case may have furnished more cause for search than in the Hart case, a fortiori the instant search is constitutional under our Hart decision.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 21976: 119752026peak 1975 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Aniceto Canales, Jr.527 F.2d 440 (5th Cir. 1976)
  2. Hart v. United States422 U.S. 1053 (1975)
  3. Arnold v. United States422 U.S. 1053 (1975)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Aniceto Canales, Jr.527 F.2d 440 (5th Cir. 1976)
  2. Hart v. United States422 U.S. 1053 (1975)
  3. Arnold v. United States422 U.S. 1053 (1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Hart, 506 F.2d 887 (5th Cir. 1975) 38
Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 (1973) 985
United States v. Merla, 493 F.2d 910 (5th Cir. 1974) 9
United States v. Hufstetler, 496 F.2d 1184 (5th Cir. 1974) 5
United States v. McGlynn, 496 F.2d 1316 (5th Cir. 1974) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list