TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Amory v. Amory

Amory v. Amory Et Al.

Amory v. Amory, 91 U.S. 356 (1876)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 20, 1876
Judges
Waite
Citations
91 U.S. 35623 L. Ed. 4361875 U.S. LEXIS 1373
Headnotes
1. A cause will not, on the ground 'that it has no merits, he advanced for argu.ment; nor will it be dismissed on motion simply because the court may be •of opinion that it'has been brought here for delay only. 2. The court will not hesitate to exercise its power to adjudge damages where it finds that its jurisdiction'has been invoked merely to gain time.
Summary
Error to the. Supreme Court of the State of New York.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Waite

Mr.' Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of ,the court.

We cannot dismiss a case on motion ¿imply because we may be of the opinion that it has been brought here for delay only. Both parties have the right to be heard on the merits; and one party cannot require the other to come to such a hearing upon a mere motion to dismiss. To dismiss-under such circumstances would be to decide that the case had no merits. Neither can we advance a cause for argument for the reason that we may think it has no merits.. Further argument may show the contrary.

We can adjudge damages, under sect. 1010 Rev. Stat. and rule 23, in all cases where it appears that a writ of error has been sued out merely'for delay. This gives us the only power we have tó prevent frivolous appeals, and writs of error; and we deem it not improper to say that this power will be exercised without hesitation in all cases where we find that our jurisdiction has been invoked merely to gain time.

Motion denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1887: 11891: 11912: 11927: 11928: 118872026peak 1887 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.226 U.S. 102 (1912)
  2. Wilson v. Beard26 F.2d 860 (2d Cir. 1928)
  3. Wilson v. Everett139 U.S. 616 (1891)
  4. Doidge v. Cunard S. S. Co.19 F.2d 500 (1st Cir. 1927)
  5. Dzialynski v. Bank of Jacksonville23 Fla. 44 (1887)

Most recent

  1. Wilson v. Beard26 F.2d 860 (2d Cir. 1928)
  2. Doidge v. Cunard S. S. Co.19 F.2d 500 (1st Cir. 1927)
  3. Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.226 U.S. 102 (1912)
  4. Wilson v. Everett139 U.S. 616 (1891)
  5. Dzialynski v. Bank of Jacksonville23 Fla. 44 (1887)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list