TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

The “Juniata”

The 'Juniata.'

The “Juniata”, 91 U.S. 366 (1875)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 18, 1875
Judges
Waite
Citations
91 U.S. 36623 L. Ed. 2081875 U.S. LEXIS 1377
Headnotes
Depositions taken under a commission from a circuit court in an admiralty case, after an appeal to this court, will not be made a part of the record, unless a sufficient excuse be shown for not taking the evidence in the usual way before the courts below.
Summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana. The decree of the Circuit Court in this case was signed Feb. 13, 1874. An appeal was taken therefrom, and the record filed here on the thirteenth day of the following October. filed á certified copy of tbe order of tbe said Circuit Court, bearing date June 1, 1875, for a commission to take tbe deposition of certain witnesses to be used bere, and moved tbat tbe depositions taken thereunder be made a part of tbe record.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Waite

Me. Chief Justice Waite delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe depositions in question were taken since tbe appeal, under a commission issued from tbe Circuit Court. Further proof in tbe case has not been ordered by this court. No such order would have been granted if application therefor bad been made, unless a sufficient excuse was shown for not taking tbe evidence in tbe usual way before tbe courts below. This was the rule established in tbe case of The Mabey, 10 Wall. 419 . We cannot admit depositions taken under - a commission from tbe Circuit Court, except upon a similar showing.. That' has not been made. Leave is granted to renew tbe motion if this defect can be supplied.

Motion denied,'

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1892: 11932: 21944: 11950: 11954: 118922026peak 1932 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. The Hermosa57 F.2d 20 (9th Cir. 1932)
  2. Luksich v. Misetich140 F.2d 812 (9th Cir. 1944)
  3. Nicaraguan Long Leaf Pine Lumber Co., Inc. v. Moody. The William G. Osment211 F.2d 715 (5th Cir. 1954)
  4. Korthinos v. Niarchos the K184 F.2d 716 (4th Cir. 1950)
  5. Maggio v. Mexico Arizona Trading Co.57 F.2d 20 (9th Cir. 1932)
  6. Insurance Co. of North America v. Venezuela52 F. 873 (2d Cir. 1892)

Most recent

  1. Nicaraguan Long Leaf Pine Lumber Co., Inc. v. Moody. The William G. Osment211 F.2d 715 (5th Cir. 1954)
  2. Korthinos v. Niarchos the K184 F.2d 716 (4th Cir. 1950)
  3. Luksich v. Misetich140 F.2d 812 (9th Cir. 1944)
  4. The Hermosa57 F.2d 20 (9th Cir. 1932)
  5. Maggio v. Mexico Arizona Trading Co.57 F.2d 20 (9th Cir. 1932)
  6. Insurance Co. of North America v. Venezuela52 F. 873 (2d Cir. 1892)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
The Mabey, 77 U.S. (10 Wall.) 419 (1870) 17

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list