TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and Raymond Williams, Willie McKay, Marion J. Eaddy, Randolph Hughes, Jr., Ariel Brownlee, William Bostic, Kenneth Howard, Alpha Christmas, Ronald Richardson, Clarence Winder, Ronald Crawford, and Frank Gilchrist, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. LOCAL UNION 542, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS Operating Engineers Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee of Philadelphia, Eastern Pennsylvania, and the State of Delaware General Building Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania, United Contractors Association, and Pennsylvania Excavating Contractors Association, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Glasgow, Inc., on its own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, The Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania, in Nos. 80-2073/74 & 80-2161. United Engineers & Constructors Inc., nonparty member of the class in the above-captioned action, in No. 80-2162. Bechtel Power Corporation, an unnamed member of the class of contractor-employers in the above-captioned matter, in No. 80-2163

Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, 648 F.2d 923 (3d Cir. 1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: rev'd sub nom. Gen. Bldg. Contractors Assn., Inc. v. Pennsylvania, 458 U.S. 375 (1982). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 19, 1981
Docket
Nos. 80-2073, 80-2074 and 80-2161 to 80-2163
Judges
Aldisert, Customs, Garth, Gibbons, Hunter, Miller, Patent, Seitz, Weis
Citations
648 F.2d 92328 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 17181981 U.S. App. LEXIS 1312127 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,262

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:

To the extent that the judgment of the district court, 507 F.Supp. 1146 , is challenged by these appeals, it is affirmed by an equally divided court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1981: 21982: 31983: 11988: 12003: 12008: 119812026peak 1982 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Taylor v. United States Department of Labor552 F. Supp. 728 (E.D. Pa. 1982)
  2. Clark v. McDonald's Corp.213 F.R.D. 198 (D.N.J. 2003)
  3. Pennsylvania v. Local 542, International Union of Operating Engineers569 F. Supp. 582 (E.D. Pa. 1983)
  4. General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. Pennsylvania458 U.S. 375 (1982)
  5. Van De Kamp v. Bank of America204 Cal. App. 3d 819 (1988)
  6. In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litig.562 F. Supp. 2d 606 (D. Del. 2008)

Most recent

  1. In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litig.562 F. Supp. 2d 606 (D. Del. 2008)
  2. Clark v. McDonald's Corp.213 F.R.D. 198 (D.N.J. 2003)
  3. Van De Kamp v. Bank of America204 Cal. App. 3d 819 (1988)
  4. Pennsylvania v. Local 542, International Union of Operating Engineers569 F. Supp. 582 (E.D. Pa. 1983)
  5. Pennsylvannia v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers555 F. Supp. 1109 (E.D. Pa. 1982)
  6. Taylor v. United States Department of Labor552 F. Supp. 728 (E.D. Pa. 1982)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, 507 F. Supp. 1146 (E.D. Pa. 1980) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list