Rodgers v. Watt

R.E. RODGERS and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. WATT, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America

Rodgers v. Watt, 705 F.2d 1176 (9th Cir. 1983)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: May 13, 1983
Docket: No. 80-3482
Judges: Alarcon, Anderson, Boochever, Browning, Canby, Choy, Farris, Ferguson, Fletcher, Goodwin, Hug, Kennedy, Nelson, Norris, Poole, Pregerson, Reinhardt, Schroeder, Skopil, Sneed, Tang, Wallace, Wright
Citations: 705 F.2d 11761983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28014

Cited by 1

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ORDER FOR PUBLICATION

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is hereby withdrawn.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 1 case

View all citing references →

U.S. Courts of Appeals1

Relies on it most ⓘ

Rakhil Felshina v. Richard Schweiker, as Secretary of Health and Human Services707 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1983)

Most recent

Rakhil Felshina v. Richard Schweiker, as Secretary of Health and Human Services707 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list