TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. United States

E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. United States, 339 U.S. 959 (1950)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 29, 1950
Docket
No. 774
Judges
Consideration, Noted, Reed, Should, Took
Citations
339 U.S. 95970 S. Ct. 100294 L. Ed. 13701950 U.S. LEXIS 25841950 Trade Cas. (CCH) 62,633
Cited by 10

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

*959 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Mr. Justice Reed is of the opinion probable jurisdiction should be noted. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1954: 11955: 11958: 11960: 11961: 11989: 21990: 11994: 219542026peak 1989 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Peyser v. General Motors Corporation158 F. Supp. 526 (S.D.N.Y. 1958)
  2. Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of Lincoln515 N.W.2d 390 (Neb. 1994)
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Company124 F. Supp. 573 (D.D.C. 1954)
  4. Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of Lincoln451 N.W.2d 702 (Neb. 1990)
  5. Giger v. City of Omaha442 N.W.2d 182 (Neb. 1989)
  6. Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of Lincoln515 N.W.2d 401 (Neb. 1994)

Most recent

  1. Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of Lincoln515 N.W.2d 390 (Neb. 1994)
  2. Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of Lincoln515 N.W.2d 401 (Neb. 1994)
  3. Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of Lincoln451 N.W.2d 702 (Neb. 1990)
  4. Mossman v. City of Columbus449 N.W.2d 214 (Neb. 1989)
  5. Giger v. City of Omaha442 N.W.2d 182 (Neb. 1989)
  6. Deutsch v. Dunne197 F. Supp. 907 (E.D.N.Y. 1961)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list