TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Prichard v. United States

Prichard v. United States, 339 U.S. 974 (1950)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 5, 1950
Docket
No. 795
Citations
339 U.S. 97470 S. Ct. 102994 L. Ed. 13801950 U.S. LEXIS 1822

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. *975 Justice Clark have disqualified themselves in this case. Because of this absence of a quorum, 28 U. S. C. § 1 , and since a majority of the qualified justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next term of Court, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed under 28 U. S. C. § 2109 , which provides that under these circumstances “the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court.”

Hugh B. Cox, Leslie W. Morris and Henry T. Duncan for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 11974: 11983: 219722026peak 1983 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kime v. Barnard144 Cal. App. 3d 246 (1983)
  2. United States ex rel. Stephen Radich v. The Criminal Court of the City of New York459 F.2d 745 (2d Cir. 1972)
  3. Deutscher v. Lick Fork, Ltd. (In re Southern Industrial Banking Corp.)35 B.R. 643 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1983)
  4. Anderson v. United States417 U.S. 211 (1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list