United States v. Penner Installation Corp.
United States v. Penner Installation Corp., 340 U.S. 898 (1950)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(banker’s statutory and common law lien extended to funds in its possession and debtor’s bankruptcy could not affect these liens)
-
(“[T]he contracting officer must act impartially in settling disputes. He must not act as a representative of one of the contracting parties, but as an impartial, unbiased judge.”)
Cited by 27 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals15
- Federal District Courts5
- Bankruptcy Courts2
- Federal Specialty Courts3
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.