TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Penner Installation Corp.

United States v. Penner Installation Corp., 340 U.S. 898 (1950)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
December 11, 1950
Docket
No. 170
Judges
Consideration, Took
Citations
340 U.S. 89871 S. Ct. 27895 L. Ed. 6511950 U.S. LEXIS 1316

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 27 cases

View all citing references →
1952: 11954: 21955: 11956: 21957: 11959: 11961: 21964: 21965: 21967: 11968: 21972: 21976: 11983: 11984: 11987: 11989: 11994: 12012: 12016: 119522026peak 1954 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Grand Jury Witness Chanie Weiss703 F.2d 653 (2d Cir. 1983)
  2. Jonal Corporation v. District of Columbia533 F.2d 1192 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  3. Davies v. McNamara275 F. Supp. 278 (D.N.H. 1967)
  4. Miller Elevator Co. v. United States30 Fed. Cl. 662 (Fed. Cl. 1994)
  5. Jerome Byrnes v. United States327 F.2d 825 (9th Cir. 1964)
  6. United States v. First National City Bank396 F.2d 897 (2d Cir. 1968)

Most recent

  1. BAE Systems Land & Armaments, L.P. v. Ibis Tek, LLC192 F. Supp. 3d 978 (D. Minnesota 2016)
  2. Atkins North America, Inc. v. United States106 Fed. Cl. 491 (Fed. Cl. 2012)
  3. Miller Elevator Co. v. United States30 Fed. Cl. 662 (Fed. Cl. 1994)
  4. Wolinsky v. Central Vermont Teachers Credit Union (In re Ford)98 B.R. 669 (Bankr. D. Vt. 1989)
  5. Chittenden Trust Co. v. Sebert Lumber, Co. (In re Vermont Toy Works, Inc.)82 B.R. 258 (Bankr. D. Vt. 1987)
  6. Nichols v. State462 So. 2d 992 (Ala. Crim. App. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list