City of Los Angeles v. Woods
City of Los Angeles v. Woods, Housing Expediter
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to the *909 District Court with directions to vacate its judgment and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the cause is moot.
Ray L. Cheseboro, Bourke Jones and Charles S. Rhyne for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman and Ed Dupree for Woods; and Hardy K. Maclay, Alexander H. Schullman, David S. Smith, Wallace M. Cohen, Herbert S. Thatcher, Arthur J. Goldberg and M. S. Ryder for Miller et al., respondents. William H. Emerson, Alexander G. Brown, Walter J. Mattison and David M. Proctor filed a brief for the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.