Town of Genoa v. Woodruff
Town of Genoa v. Woodruff Et Al.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
*503 Mr. Justice Strong delivered the opinion of the court.
Twenty-six errors have been assigned in this case, not one of which can be sustained. All which have the least plausibility have been considered and declared unfounded in Town of Venice v. Murdoch, supra, p. 494; and the others might well be dismissed without special notice. The thirteenth complains that the circuit judge decided that the plaintiffs could recover interest upon the coupons from the time they fell due. That the ruling was correct is perfectly plain. It was in entire accordance with the decisions generally of the State courts and also of this court.
The other assignments have either been answered in Town of Venice v. Murdoch, or they are totally without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Justice Miller, Mr. Justice Davis, and Mr. Justice Field, dissented.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 23 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court6
- U.S. Courts of Appeals4
- Federal District Courts4
- Historical Federal Courts2
- State Highest Courts6
- State Trial Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.