TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rosecrans v. West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Ass'n

Rosecrans v. West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Association

Rosecrans v. West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Ass'n, 340 U.S. 924 (1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 26, 1951
Docket
No. 504
Judges
Are, Black, Noted, Should
Citations
340 U.S. 92471 S. Ct. 50095 L. Ed. 6671951 U.S. LEXIS 2164

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the

want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 119742026peak 1974 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Texas County Irrigation & Water Resources Ass'n v. Dunnett1974 OK 118, 527 P.2d 578

Most recent

  1. Texas County Irrigation & Water Resources Ass'n v. Dunnett1974 OK 118, 527 P.2d 578

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list