Riss & Co. v. United States

Riss & Co., Inc. v. United States

Riss & Co. v. United States, 341 U.S. 907 (1951)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: April 16, 1951
Docket: No. 479
Citations: 341 U.S. 90771 S. Ct. 62095 L. Ed. 13451951 U.S. LEXIS 1985

Cited by 41 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Per Curiam: The judgment is reversed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(a yer curiam opinion reversing 96 F.Supp. 452, and relying solely upon Wong Yang Sung)

Allied Van Lines Co. v. United States, 303 F. Supp. 742 (C.D. Cal. 1969)

Cited by 41 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Deering Milliken, Inc., a Corporation v. Reed Johnston, as Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board295 F.2d 856 (4th Cir. 1961)
Philip Kerner v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare340 F.2d 736 (2d Cir. 1965)
R. A. Holman & Co., Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission366 F.2d 446 (2d Cir. 1966)
Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. v. United States138 F. Supp. 411 (N.D. Tex. 1956)
National Labor Relations Board v. The Newton-New Haven Company506 F.2d 1035 (2d Cir. 1974)
Chicago & E. I. R. Co. v. United States107 F. Supp. 118 (S.D. Ind. 1952)

Most recent

Ligon Specialized Hauler, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission587 F.2d 304 (6th Cir. 1978)
Koniag, Inc., the Village of Uyak v. Cecil D580 F.2d 601 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
Koniag, Inc. v. Andrus580 F.2d 601 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
North American Van Lines, Inc. v. United States412 F. Supp. 782 (N.D. Ind. 1976)
Koniag, Inc. v. Kleppe405 F. Supp. 1360 (D.D.C. 1975)
North American Van Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission386 F. Supp. 665 (N.D. Ind. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list