Crest Specialty v. Trager
Crest Specialty, a Limited Partnership v. Trager, doing business as Topic Toys
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Certi-orari, 340 U. S. 928 , to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. *913 Per Curiam: The judgment is reversed. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp., 340 U. S. 147 .
April 23, 1951. Clarence E. Threedy argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Max R. Kraus argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Sidney Neuman.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Hygienic Specialties Co. v. H. G. Salzman, Inc., Hutzler Mfg. Co., and C. B. Cotton & Co., Inc.
- Thys Co. v. Oeste
- Oriental Foods, Inc. v. Chun King Sales, Inc.
- Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.
- Briggs & Stratton Corporation v. Clinton MacHine Co., Inc., Clinton MacHine Co., Inc. -Cross v. Briggs & Stratton Corporation -Cross
- Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. Clinton Machine Co.
Most recent
- Hygienic Specialties Co. v. H. G. Salzman, Inc., Hutzler Mfg. Co., and C. B. Cotton & Co., Inc.
- Briggs & Stratton Corporation v. Clinton MacHine Co., Inc., Clinton MacHine Co., Inc. -Cross v. Briggs & Stratton Corporation -Cross
- Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. Clinton Machine Co.
- Oriental Foods, Inc., a Corporation v. Chun King Sales, Inc., and Jeno F
- Oriental Foods, Inc. v. Chun King Sales, Inc.
- Thys Co. v. Oeste
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.