TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. National Labor Relations Board

United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, District Council of Kansas City, Missouri v. National Labor Relations Board

United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 341 U.S. 947 (1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 4, 1951
Docket
No. 387
Citations
341 U.S. 94771 S. Ct. 101195 L. Ed. 137128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 21321951 U.S. LEXIS 2412
Cited by 30

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 30 cases

View all citing references →
1953: 11955: 11956: 21957: 31962: 21963: 31965: 11967: 21968: 21970: 21973: 11977: 11979: 11980: 21986: 11987: 11988: 11994: 21995: 119532026peak 1957 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Pickering428 A.2d 322 (Conn. 1980)
  2. State v. White528 A.2d 811 (Conn. 1987)
  3. Southwest Engineering Co. v. Ernst291 P.2d 764 (Ariz. 1955)
  4. Bulova Watch Co. v. Zale Jewelry Co. of Cheyenne371 P.2d 409 (Wyo. 1962)
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Solo Cup Company237 F.2d 521 (8th Cir. 1956)
  6. Melvin Edmond Surrett and Billy Charles Walden v. United States421 F.2d 403 (5th Cir. 1970)

Most recent

  1. Stephens v. Pennsylvania State Board of Nursing657 A.2d 71 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1995)
  2. Will v. Electrical Contractors Examining Board650 A.2d 1226 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1994) · Dissent
  3. Thanh Long Le v. Waters863 F. Supp. 1104 (N.D. Cal. 1994)
  4. Slovak-American Citizens Club of Oakview v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board549 A.2d 251 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988)
  5. State v. White528 A.2d 811 (Conn. 1987)
  6. People v. Coad181 Cal. App. 3d 1094 (1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list