Holland v. Capital Transit Co.

Holland v. Capital Transit Co., 341 U.S. 954 (1951)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: June 4, 1951
Docket: No. 445
Citations: 341 U.S. 95471 S. Ct. 100495 L. Ed. 13751951 U.S. LEXIS 1774

Cited by 34 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(remand based on consideration of the record as well as confession of error by the Solicitor General)

Akers v. Principi, 17 Vet. App. 561 (Vet. App. 2004)
(decided after the defendant was sentenced and which held that convictions for receiving and possession were actually includable only under the single crime of selling counterfeit bank notes)

United States v. Dipalermo, 340 F.2d 988 (2d Cir. 1965)

Cited by 34 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. William Bentvena319 F.2d 916 (2d Cir. 1963)
United States v. Rosenberg195 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1952)
United States v. Angelo Bertolotti529 F.2d 149 (2d Cir. 1975)
United States v. Gondolfo Miranti, United States of America v. Domenico Bando253 F.2d 135 (2d Cir. 1958)
United States v. Johnson584 F.2d 148 (6th Cir. 1978)
United States v. On Lee193 F.2d 306 (2d Cir. 1952)

Most recent

Martin v. State885 A.2d 339 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2005)
Mabel A. Akers v. Anthony J. Principi17 Vet. App. 561 (Vet. App. 2004) · Dissent
United States v. George H. Snow670 F.2d 749 (7th Cir. 1982)
People v. Linzey315 N.W.2d 550 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981)
United States v. Epigmenio Garcia-Geronimo663 F.2d 738 (7th Cir. 1981)
United States v. Clyde Lee Johnson, Jr., United States of America v584 F.2d 148 (6th Cir. 1978)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list