TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ray v. Blair

Ray, Chairman of the State Democratic Executive Committee of Alabama v. Blair

Ray v. Blair, 343 U.S. 911 (1952)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 25, 1952
Docket
No. 649
Judges
Consideration, Motion, Took
Citations
343 U.S. 91172 S. Ct. 64596 L. Ed. 13281952 U.S. LEXIS 2283

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The motion of respondent to vacate or modify the stay order of

March 24, 1952, ante, p. 901, is denied.

Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 19 cases

View all citing references →
1956: 11963: 11964: 21968: 11973: 11974: 11977: 21982: 11986: 11988: 11992: 21993: 11997: 12000: 12004: 12010: 119562026peak 1964 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lsi Industries Inc. v. Hubbell Lighting, Inc.232 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
  2. Sternberg v. O'NEIL550 A.2d 1105 (Del. 1988)
  3. McLaughlin v. Copeland435 F. Supp. 513 (D. Maryland 1977)
  4. Ford Motor Company v. Arguello382 P.2d 886 (Wyo. 1963)
  5. Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicine988 F. Supp. 127 (W.D.N.Y. 1997)
  6. Tejal Vyas, LLC v. Carriage Park Ltd. Partnership600 S.E.2d 881 (N.C. Ct. App. 2004)

Most recent

  1. Goldberg v. UBS AG690 F. Supp. 2d 92 (E.D.N.Y. 2010)
  2. Tejal Vyas, LLC v. Carriage Park Ltd. Partnership600 S.E.2d 881 (N.C. Ct. App. 2004)
  3. Lsi Industries Inc. v. Hubbell Lighting, Inc.232 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
  4. Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicine988 F. Supp. 127 (W.D.N.Y. 1997)
  5. Covia v. Robinson507 N.W.2d 411 (Iowa 1993)
  6. Bechard v. Constanzo810 F. Supp. 579 (D. Vt. 1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list