Richfield Oil Corp. v. United States
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
The Court is of the opinion that the issues raised by this appeal are substantially the same as those decided in Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 337 U. S. 293 (1949). Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Burton, while adhering to their views expressed in Standard Oil Co. v. United States, supra, join in affirming the judgment of the District Court in this case. Mr. Justice Frankfurter, not having heard the argument, owing to illness, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 41 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals19
- Federal District Courts10
- State Highest Courts6
- State Appellate Courts5
- State Specialty Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil Corporation
- H. W. Martens and Robert A. Maurin, Jr. v. Carl F. Barrett, B. C. Farcell and the Texas Company
- Richard S. Simpson v. Union Oil Company of California
- Richfield Oil Corporation v. Karseal Corporation
- City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co.
- Richard S. Simpson v. Union Oil Company of California
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.