TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Division 26 of the Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees v. City of Detroit

Division 26 of the Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. City of Detroit

Div. 26 of the Amalgamated Ass'n of St., Elec. Ry. & Motor Coach Employees v. City of Detroit, 344 U.S. 805 (1952)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 13, 1952
Docket
No. 207
Judges
Black, Burton, Douglas, Noted, Should
Citations
344 U.S. 80573 S. Ct. 3797 L. Ed. 62730 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 27121952 U.S. LEXIS 2721

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent. Mr. Justice Burton is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 11968: 119662026peak 1966 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. City of New York v. De Lury243 N.E.2d 128 (N.Y. 1968)
  2. Weinstein v. New York City Transit Authority49 Misc. 2d 170 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1966)

Most recent

  1. City of New York v. De Lury243 N.E.2d 128 (N.Y. 1968)
  2. Weinstein v. New York City Transit Authority49 Misc. 2d 170 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list