Burlington County Bridge Commission v. Driscoll

Burlington County Bridge Commission v. Driscoll, Governor Nongard, trading as Ketcham & Nongard v. Driscoll, Governor and Bell v. Driscoll, Governor

Burlington Cnty. Bridge Comm'n v. Driscoll, 344 U.S. 888 (1952)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: November 17, 1952
Docket: Nos. 137; No. 184; No. 188
Judges: Applications, Consideration, Took
Citations: 344 U.S. 888

Cited by 1

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ante, p. 838. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 1 case

View all citing references →

State Appellate Courts1

Relies on it most ⓘ

MAYOR AND MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF CITY OF CLIFTON v. Passaic Valley Water Com'n539 A.2d 760 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1987)

Most recent

MAYOR AND MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF CITY OF CLIFTON v. Passaic Valley Water Com'n539 A.2d 760 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list