Tom We Shung v. Brownell
Tom We Shung v. Brownell, Attorney General
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Certiorari, 346 U. S. 854 , to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint. Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U. S. 229 .
Mr. Justice Black would re *907 verse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Mb. Justice Douglas and Mb. Justice Jackson dissent. Jack Wasserman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Murray L. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg, J. F. Bishop, L. Paul Winings and Maurice A. Roberts.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 20 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- United States ex rel. Tom We Shung v. Murff
- City of Derby v. Water Resources Commission
- Tom We Shung v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
- Jose Bernardo Estevez v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
- In re Kuriappan P. Alappat, Edward E. Averill and James G. Larsen
- Robert L. McLaurin v. Josef E. Fischer, and University of Cincinnati
Most recent
- Le v. Astrue
- In re Kuriappan P. Alappat, Edward E. Averill and James G. Larsen
- Benoit Brookens v. Dawn White
- Robert L. McLaurin v. Josef E. Fischer, and University of Cincinnati
- Baker v. Ives
- Troy S. Morris and the Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Uhl & Lopez Engineers, Inc., United States of America v. Uhl & Lopez Engineers, Inc., and Gottlieb Contracting, Inc.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.