TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Government & Civic Employees Organizing Committee v. Windsor

Government and Civic Employees Organizing Committee, CIO v. Windsor

Gov't & Civic Employees Organizing Comm. v. Windsor, 347 U.S. 901 (1954)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 1, 1954
Docket
No. 505
Judges
Consideration, Took
Citations
347 U.S. 90174 S. Ct. 42998 L. Ed. 106133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 24521954 U.S. LEXIS 2719

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 18 cases

View all citing references →
1956: 21957: 11958: 11963: 31964: 11966: 11967: 11968: 11970: 21972: 21975: 11998: 12015: 119562026peak 1963 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. NATIONAL ASS'N FOR ADVANCE. OF COLORED PEOPLE v. Patty159 F. Supp. 503 (E.D. Va. 1958)
  2. Alabama Labor Council, Aflcio, Public Employees Union, Local No. 1279 v. The State of Alabama453 F.2d 922 (5th Cir. 1972)
  3. People v. Woody394 P.2d 813 (Cal. 1964)
  4. Roy v. Wainwright151 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 1963)
  5. Alan McSurely v. John L. McClellan Chairman426 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
  6. Jose Romero v. Colbert Coldwell455 F.2d 1163 (5th Cir. 1972)

Most recent

  1. In re Andrew A.No. C076974 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 15, 2015)
  2. Carrouche v. City of New Orleans29 F. Supp. 2d 740 (E.D. La. 1998)
  3. Teamsters Loc. U. No. 822 v. City of Portsmouth, Va.423 F. Supp. 954 (E.D. Va. 1975)
  4. Jose Romero v. Colbert Coldwell455 F.2d 1163 (5th Cir. 1972)
  5. Alabama Labor Council, Aflcio, Public Employees Union, Local No. 1279 v. The State of Alabama453 F.2d 922 (5th Cir. 1972)
  6. Dixon v. Attorney General313 F. Supp. 653 (M.D. Penn. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list