TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jacobson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Jacobson, Administratrix v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co.

Jacobson v. N.Y., New Haven & Hartford R.R., 347 U.S. 909 (1954)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 8, 1954
Docket
No. 404
Citations
347 U.S. 90974 S. Ct. 47498 L. Ed. 10671954 U.S. LEXIS 2430

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed. Patch v. Wabash R. Co., 207 U. S. 277 ; Memphis & Charleston R. Co. v. Alabama, 107 U. S. 581 ; Seavey v. Boston & Maine R. Co., 197 F. 2d 485 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1955: 11956: 11960: 21961: 11980: 12007: 119552026peak 1960 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Richard D. Di Frischia v. New York Central Railroad Company279 F.2d 141 (3d Cir. 1960)
  2. Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission v. Miller147 F. Supp. 270 (E.D. Pa. 1956)
  3. Shenker v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad196 F. Supp. 108 (W.D. Pa. 1961)
  4. James J. Canton, Robert Reeves and L. B. Johnson v. Angelina Casualty Company279 F.2d 553 (5th Cir. 1960)
  5. Barnett v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp.488 F. Supp. 786 (E.D. Ark. 1980)
  6. Waller v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad127 F. Supp. 863 (S.D.N.Y. 1955)

Most recent

  1. Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC v. Segway Inc.519 F. Supp. 2d 662 (E.D. Mich. 2007)
  2. Barnett v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp.488 F. Supp. 786 (E.D. Ark. 1980)
  3. Shenker v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad196 F. Supp. 108 (W.D. Pa. 1961)
  4. James J. Canton, Robert Reeves and L. B. Johnson v. Angelina Casualty Company279 F.2d 553 (5th Cir. 1960)
  5. Richard D. Di Frischia v. New York Central Railroad Company279 F.2d 141 (3d Cir. 1960)
  6. Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission v. Miller147 F. Supp. 270 (E.D. Pa. 1956)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Memphis & Charleston R.R. v. Alabama, 107 U.S. 581 (1883) 59
Patch v. Wabash R.R., 207 U.S. 277 (1907) 38
Seavey v. Boston & Me. R. R., 197 F.2d 485 (1st Cir. 1952) 20

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list