Papalardo v. United States

Papalardo v. United States, 349 U.S. 920 (1955)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: May 9, 1955
Docket: No. 654
Citations: 349 U.S. 92075 S. Ct. 65999 L. Ed. 12521955 U.S. LEXIS 872

Cited by 8

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 8 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

City of Farmington, New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Amoco Production Company, Amoco Gas Company820 F.2d 1308 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
Lo-Vaca Gathering Company, Houston Pipe Line Company and El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission323 F.2d 190 (5th Cir. 1963)
United States v. Ramon Hernandez290 F.2d 86 (2d Cir. 1961)
Clifford L. Alexander, Secretary of the Army v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Cities Service Gas Company609 F.2d 543 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Power Commission232 F.2d 467 (3d Cir. 1956)
Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Signal Oil and Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission334 F.2d 404 (8th Cir. 1964)

Most recent

City of Farmington, New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Amoco Production Company, Amoco Gas Company820 F.2d 1308 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
Clifford L. Alexander, Secretary of the Army v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Cities Service Gas Company609 F.2d 543 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Signal Oil and Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission334 F.2d 404 (8th Cir. 1964)
Lo-Vaca Gathering Company, Houston Pipe Line Company and El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission323 F.2d 190 (5th Cir. 1963)
United States v. Ramon Hernandez290 F.2d 86 (2d Cir. 1961)
Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co. v. Village of Deshler, Nebraska192 F. Supp. 303 (D. Neb. 1960)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list