TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States ex rel. Toth v. Talbott

United States ex rel. Toth v. Talbott, Secretary of the Air Force

United States ex rel. Toth v. Talbott, 349 U.S. 949 (1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 6, 1955
Docket
No. 150
Citations
349 U.S. 94975 S. Ct. 87999 L. Ed. 12741955 U.S. LEXIS 606

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Certiorari, 348 U. S. 809 , to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Argued February 8-9, 1955. This case is restored to the docket for reargument.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 6 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →
1956: 11958: 11960: 11961: 11964: 11972: 11975: 21978: 11979: 21982: 11996: 12007: 119562026peak 1975 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Johnson v. State930 S.W.2d 589 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)
  2. United States v. George Gordon Liddy510 F.2d 669 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  3. Forbes v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections931 A.2d 88 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007)
  4. Walter Martin, Jr. v. United States517 F.2d 906 (8th Cir. 1975)
  5. In re Grand Jury Proceedings of Denise Garmon, in Re Grand Jury Proceedings of Courtney D. Washington572 F.2d 1373 (9th Cir. 1978)
  6. Case v. Roebling127 A.2d 409 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1956)

Most recent

  1. Forbes v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections931 A.2d 88 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007)
  2. Johnson v. State930 S.W.2d 589 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)
  3. Caballery v. United States Parole Commission673 F.2d 43 (2d Cir. 1982)
  4. Henrique v. United States Marshal476 F. Supp. 618 (N.D. Cal. 1979)
  5. United States v. Richardson7 M.J. 690 (1979)
  6. In re Grand Jury Proceedings of Denise Garmon, in Re Grand Jury Proceedings of Courtney D. Washington572 F.2d 1373 (9th Cir. 1978)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list