Liddon v. Commissioner
Liddon et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Liddon v. Comm'r, 352 U.S. 824 (1956)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
('if the Commission is now to abandon the treatment historically accorded pipeline-produced gas in rate making on the ground that the ultimate public interest will be better served thereby, the Commission should justify it on the record.')
-
("Where the interlocutory order, for all practical purposes, presents a somewhat final aspect, an appellate court will review it in order to safeguard basic human rights or to prevent a great injustice to a defendant.")
Cited by 67 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals45
- Federal District Courts5
- Federal Specialty Courts12
- State Highest Courts3
- State Appellate Courts2
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
- Deep South Oil Company of Texas v. Federal Power Commission
- Public Service Commission for the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, Atlantic Richfield Co.
- City of Chicago, Illinois v. Federal Power Commission, Pipeline Production Group
- J. E. Davant and Kathryn Davant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. J. E. Davant and Kathryn Davant
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.